Sign up Calendar Latest Topics
 
Categories > Off Topic > Battlestar Galactica Mod for ver 2.6
 
 


Reply
  Author   Comment   Page 2 of 3      Prev   1   2   3   Next
Longbowman1346

Avatar / Picture

Registered:
Posts: 549
Posted Reply with quote  #16 
This is the background we are using to "explain" the reappearance of the Galactica for use in the game.

 
Attached Files
docx COLONIAL HIGH COMMAND - BSG MOD Report.docx (55.99 KB, 8 views)


__________________
Captain -  TSN Belisarius BS-108
"Pax per consilia et maxime armis." -  "Rescindentes venator ad venationem." 

(Deane Geiken)

Longbowman1346

Avatar / Picture

Registered:
Posts: 549
Posted Reply with quote  #17 
Here is the manual that is not now current to the 2.6 version but was for the 2.2 version.

 
Attached Files
docx BSG_MODULE_MANUAL updated 8-2015.docx (1.77 MB, 11 views)


__________________
Captain -  TSN Belisarius BS-108
"Pax per consilia et maxime armis." -  "Rescindentes venator ad venationem." 

(Deane Geiken)

ron77

Registered:
Posts: 161
Posted Reply with quote  #18 
Somehow my word processor messed up these files and made them completely unreadable. Would it be possible to post links in PDF format?
Longbowman1346

Avatar / Picture

Registered:
Posts: 549
Posted Reply with quote  #19 
Here is a PDF of the storyline.

 
Attached Files
pdf COLONIAL HIGH COMMAND - BSG MOD Report.pdf (316.24 KB, 10 views)


__________________
Captain -  TSN Belisarius BS-108
"Pax per consilia et maxime armis." -  "Rescindentes venator ad venationem." 

(Deane Geiken)

Longbowman1346

Avatar / Picture

Registered:
Posts: 549
Posted Reply with quote  #20 
Ok.  Here is the MOD manual.  Remember it is not updated fully for 2.6.   https://drive.google.com/open?id=1anOLIJ81MapNvqIniZbKjpqo4KzJK1WC
__________________
Captain -  TSN Belisarius BS-108
"Pax per consilia et maxime armis." -  "Rescindentes venator ad venationem." 

(Deane Geiken)
ron77

Registered:
Posts: 161
Posted Reply with quote  #21 
Awesome, thanks!

While we're waiting for a 2.7 BSG Mod, any chance someone could throw in a link for the 2.6 BSG Mod? I love the pictures in this thread and want to give the mod a go but can't find a link anywhere.
ron77

Registered:
Posts: 161
Posted Reply with quote  #22 
So, no word yet on the actual download for the Artemis 2.6 BSG Mod?
Longbowman1346

Avatar / Picture

Registered:
Posts: 549
Posted Reply with quote  #23 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ron77
So, no word yet on the actual download for the Artemis 2.6 BSG Mod?


Working on finding out if it is available.
__________________
Captain -  TSN Belisarius BS-108
"Pax per consilia et maxime armis." -  "Rescindentes venator ad venationem." 

(Deane Geiken)
Bulldog

Avatar / Picture

Registered:
Posts: 16
Posted Reply with quote  #24 
Sorry it's been awhile but here was the last workable version 

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B1Xc9dn_hN7USGpnMjcyOWRlTnM

Currently trying to upgrade it to v.2.7.1
ron77

Registered:
Posts: 161
Posted Reply with quote  #25 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulldog
Sorry it's been awhile but here was the last workable version 

Currently trying to upgrade it to v.2.7.1

YES! You are my personal hero! [love]
Longbowman1346

Avatar / Picture

Registered:
Posts: 549
Posted Reply with quote  #26 
This makes me so happy! BSG will rock with the 2.7.1 update!
__________________
Captain -  TSN Belisarius BS-108
"Pax per consilia et maxime armis." -  "Rescindentes venator ad venationem." 

(Deane Geiken)
ron77

Registered:
Posts: 161
Posted Reply with quote  #27 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Longbowman1346
BSG will rock with the 2.7.1 update!

To tell you the truth, I think the 2.7 Comms console is going to feel very BSG.
ron77

Registered:
Posts: 161
Posted Reply with quote  #28 
So, we tried out the 2.6 BSG mod during our hardware test and it ran smoothly. At the convention last weekend, however, we kept running into problems when too many bridges logged into the server. I'm not sure why this happened or if it has anything to do with the mod, but I thought it might be a good idea to throw this out there since the 2.6 BSG mod is a beta version and from what I heard work is underway for the 2.7.1 BSG mod.
Longbowman1346

Avatar / Picture

Registered:
Posts: 549
Posted Reply with quote  #29 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ron77
So, we tried out the 2.6 BSG mod during our hardware test and it ran smoothly. At the convention last weekend, however, we kept running into problems when too many bridges logged into the server. I'm not sure why this happened or if it has anything to do with the mod, but I thought it might be a good idea to throw this out there since the 2.6 BSG mod is a beta version and from what I heard work is underway for the 2.7.1 BSG mod.



Thank you for the update!  I will pass this along.  BTW....  what different levels did you play on?  And did you play any missions or simply the solo/coop games?   How many bridges did you have?
__________________
Captain -  TSN Belisarius BS-108
"Pax per consilia et maxime armis." -  "Rescindentes venator ad venationem." 

(Deane Geiken)
ron77

Registered:
Posts: 161
Posted Reply with quote  #30 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Longbowman1346
Thank you for the update!  I will pass this along.  BTW....  what different levels did you play on?  And did you play any missions or simply the solo/coop games?   How many bridges did you have?

Thanks for passing it along.

At the convention we played standard scenarios, solo single front to teach newbies the controls and then a 4-bridge coop siege scenario to really get the juices flowing. I believe the solo scenarios were usually level 4 and for the siege we would ramp it up to 5, 6, 7, or sometimes even 8, depending on how well the crews seemed to handle the game.

From what I can gather, during our hardware test we ran the game for maybe 15-20 minutes. I believe we did a quick PvP game with one person per bridge desperately trying to handle 5-6 laptops. [biggrin] Thinking back, I'm almost certain that we didn't run a coop test scenario and maybe that was part of the problem; or rather, we might have spotted the problem earlier if it was scenario related.

In the future, to properly portray the post-Cylon War BSG universe, we might opt for a solo scenario with one bridge and another 18-20 laptops running fighter squadrons of 3 or 4 fighters each. The main reason why we run multi-ship games is so that Comms has more to do. However, instead of other battlestars to talk to, handling several fighter squadrons will likely keep Comms very busy. [crazy]
Previous Topic | Next Topic
Print
Reply

Quick Navigation:

Easily create a Forum Website with Website Toolbox.